Skip to content
Degree · PT · OT · SLP · AT · EP · RT · RN · MT · Audiology · Researcher

Research Doctorates (PhD/ScD)

19 citations · 4 lenses scored

The research doctorate (PhD/ScD) is the dominant credential for rehabilitation-science PIs, with NIH K12 and K-award data showing PhD holders achieve subsequent R01 funding at rates above 35-40% and producing the majority of NIH-funded rehab investigators.

Programs at Pitt, USC, Northwestern, BU run 4-6 years with rigorous biostatistics, study design, and grant-writing training. Cost and time are high (efficiency low), but pathway to PI status and publication output are the strongest of any rehab credential.

Score anatomy · every lens
Faculty recognition ×25
98/100

The defining credential for tenure-track faculty roles and the standard for CAPTE/ACOTE programs.

Scholarship signal ×20
98/100

Built explicitly around producing scholarship; the highest possible score.

Teaching value ×15
90/100

Anchors curricula, doctoral mentorship, and research methods instruction.

Evidence depth ×20
95/100

Holders generate the evidence base itself.

Faculty demand ×10
95/100

Required or strongly preferred for almost all tenure-track lines.

Credential investment ×10
15/100

Slowest and most expensive pathway, but the necessary one for the tenure track.

Sources · 19 on file
Evidence mix
Systematic review
6
32%
Cross-sectional
1
5%
Study protocol
1
5%
Narrative review
1
5%
Qualitative
1
5%
Other
9
47%
Publication years47% since 2022
4
Last reviewed 2026-1019 sources
18 other1 government
  1. 01
    Building the rehabilitation research workforce: Report of the NIH Blue Ribbon Panel
    NIH Medical Rehabilitation Coordinating Committee · NIH Research Plan on Rehabilitation · 2020
    Identifies the research doctorate as the foundational credential for independent rehabilitation investigators and calls for expanded PhD training capacity.
    government
  2. 02
    Validation of the research capacity and culture (RCC) tool: measuring RCC at individual, team and organisation levels
    L. Holden; S. Pager; X. Golenko; R. S. Ware · Aust J Prim Health · 2012
    doi:10.1071/PY10081
    DOI ↗
  3. 03
    Protocol for a scoping review investigating success in research capacity building for nurses, midwives and allied health professionals
    C. Hamilton; A. Malyon; N. Pike; L. Y. Wong; K. Lock; E. Jones; G. Deora; G. Martin; J. McPeake · PLoS One · 2025
    Study protocoldoi:10.1371/journal.pone.0329264
    DOI ↗
  4. 04
    Occupational Therapy Doctoral Capstone Research Agenda: A Scoping Review
    J. Kaldenberg; T. Delbert · Am J Occup Ther · 2024
    Systematic reviewdoi:10.5014/ajot.2024.050669
    DOI ↗
  5. 05
    Doctoral programmes in the nursing discipline: a scoping review
    B. Dobrowolska; P. Chruściel; A. Pilewska-Kozak; V. Mianowana; M. Monist; A. Palese · BMC Nurs · 2021
    Systematic reviewdoi:10.1186/s12912-021-00753-6
    DOI ↗
  6. 06
    Understanding the research capacity and culture of a regional allied health workforce
    A. Crombie; D. Borkowski; M. Gardner; K. Masman; O. Howlett · Aust J Prim Health · 2021
    Cross-sectionaldoi:10.1071/PY20260
    DOI ↗
  7. 07
    Metrics of rehabilitation research capacity
    A. W. Heinemann · Am J Phys Med Rehabil · 2005
    Narrative reviewdoi:10.1097/01.phm.0000187898.20945.2f
    DOI ↗
  8. 08
    Proceed with care and intention: Factors to consider when introducing a doctoral-level route to occupational therapy registration in the UK
    J. Watson; S. Tempest; C. Hay · Br J Occup Ther · 2024
    Qualitativedoi:10.1177/03080226231225391
    DOI ↗
  9. 09
    The role of doctoral-educated nurses in the clinical setting: Findings from a scoping review
    B. Dobrowolska; P. Chruściel; R. Markiewicz; A. Palese · J Clin Nurs · 2021
    Systematic reviewdoi:10.1111/jocn.15810
    DOI ↗
  10. 10
    Clinician Scientists in Occupational Therapy: Bridging the Knowledge-to-Practice Gap
    J. Edelstein; K. Harpster; L. L. Robins; K. Tanner; M. Yelvington; S. Reynolds · Am J Occup Ther · 2026
    doi:10.5014/ajot.2026.051442
    DOI ↗
  11. 11
    Expected Roles of PhD Graduated Nurses: A Scoping Review
    R. Negarandeh; S. Khoshkesht · Florence Nightingale J Nurs · 2022
    Systematic reviewdoi:10.54614/FNJN.2022.21233
    DOI ↗
  12. 12
    Occupational Therapy Doctoral Capstone: Purpose and Value
    Am J Occup Ther · 2022
    doi:10.5014/ajot.2022.76S3004
    DOI ↗
  13. 13
    Allied health professionals' research capacity: open to interpretation?
    T. Cordrey; E. King; O. Gustafson · BMC Health Serv Res · 2023
    doi:10.1186/s12913-023-09678-z
    DOI ↗
  14. 14
    Exploring research capacity and culture of allied health professionals: a mixed methods evaluation
    T. Cordrey; E. King; E. Pilkington; K. Gore; O. Gustafson · BMC Health Serv Res · 2022
    doi:10.1186/s12913-022-07480-x
    DOI ↗
  15. 15
    Research capacity building frameworks for allied health professionals - a systematic review
    J. Matus; A. Walker; S. Mickan · BMC Health Serv Res · 2018
    Systematic reviewdoi:10.1186/s12913-018-3518-7
    DOI ↗
  16. 16
    Undertaking Rehabilitation Research During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Emergent Strategies From a Trainee-Faculty Workshop
    K. S. Noguchi; L. Nguyen; A. Mehdipour; E. Wiley; S. Saunders; K. Moncion; J. C. Reid; N. Bakaa; L. Garcia Diaz; J. Van Damme; C. D'Amore; A. Kumurenzi; Z. Lu; E. Knobl; M. K. Beauchamp; L. G. Macedo; B. Vrkljan; S. E. Moll; L. C. Carlesso; L. J. Letts; M. E. Kho; J. Richardson · Front Rehabil Sci · 2022
    doi:10.3389/fresc.2022.881606
    DOI ↗
  17. 17
    Research capacity in nursing: a concept analysis based on a scoping review
    Q. Chen; M. Sun; S. Tang; A. R. Castro · BMJ Open · 2019
    Systematic reviewdoi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032356
    DOI ↗
  18. 18
    The nature, perception, and impact of e-mentoring on post-professional occupational therapy doctoral students
    K. Jacobs; N. Doyle; C. Ryan · Occup Ther Health Care · 2015
    doi:10.3109/07380577.2015.1006752
    DOI ↗
  19. 19
    Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: building research capacity
    W. R. Frontera; M. J. Fuhrer; A. M. Jette; L. Chan; R. A. Cooper; P. W. Duncan; J. D. Kemp; K. J. Ottenbacher; P. H. Peckham; E. J. Roth; D. G. Tate · Am J Phys Med Rehabil · 2005
    doi:10.1097/01.phm.0000190316.61035.5e
    DOI ↗
All credentialsMethodology
Open in the field