Certification · QA · PT · OT · Informatics
ISO 13485 / Medical Device QMS Training
23 citations · 1 lens scored
ISO 13485 Lead Auditor and Internal Auditor certificates (BSI, SGS, ASQ, Exemplar Global) are commonly listed as required/preferred in MedTech QA/RA postings at Stryker, Medtronic, J&J MedTech, and Boston Scientific, where QA Engineer I/II salaries range $75K–$110K and Senior QA/RA Specialist roles reach $110K–$150K per BLS OES data for QA roles in medical-device manufacturing (NAICS 3391).
Short courses run $1,500–$3,000 and 2–5 days, but PTs/OTs rarely list 13485 alone; it is most effective when paired with prior MedTech exposure (clinical specialist, field rep) since the standard is process/audit-focused rather than clinical.
Score anatomy · every lens
Industry placement ×25
55/100
Useful signal for MedTech QA/RA roles but typically secondary to engineering or RAC credentials for new entrants from clinical backgrounds.
Vendor / employer demand ×20
60/100
Frequently appears as preferred in QA/RA postings at Stryker, Medtronic, J&J MedTech, and contract manufacturers, though less common at Epic/payer/digital-health employers.
Salary premium ×20
50/100
QA Specialist roles in MedTech pay $75K–$110K entry, exceeding bedside PT median (~$97K BLS 2024) modestly, with meaningful upside at senior/lead-auditor levels.
Technical skill depth ×15
55/100
Builds real auditable competency in QMS processes, CAPA, design controls, and risk (ISO 14971) usable on day one.
Transition fit ×10
35/100
Weak bridge from pure bedside clinical work; best leveraged after a clinical-specialist or field-clinical role provides device-industry context.
Credential investment ×10
80/100
Short (2–5 day) courses costing $1.5K–$3K with open enrollment make it among the most accessible MedTech credentials.
Sources · 23 on file
Evidence mix
- 9
- 39%
- 2
- 9%
- 1
- 4%
- 11
- 48%
Publication years65% since 2022
6
Last reviewed 2026-1023 sources
19 other2 government1 industry1 professional-society
- 01Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics: QA Roles in Medical Equipment Manufacturing (NAICS 339100)U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · BLS OEWS · 2024Documents wage distributions for QA/QC roles in medical-device manufacturing, with median wages above general clinical therapist medians and senior roles reaching six figures.government
- 02DOI ↗ISO 13485:2016 — Medical devices — Quality management systems — Requirements for regulatory purposesInternational Organization for Standardization · ISO · 2016ISO 13485:2016 is the international standard itself, published by the International Organization for Standardization, which normatively defines the medical device QMS scope and requirements that third-party training certificates attest to; cited as the underlying normative document rather than as independent evidence of training program quality.industrydoi:10.2345/9781570206047.ch1
- 03Workforce trends in regulatory affairs and quality assurance for medical devicesRegulatory Affairs Professionals Society (RAPS) · RAPS Compensation & Scope of Practice Report · 2023Reports that 13485 auditor training and RAC credentials are the two most-cited qualifications in MedTech QA/RA postings and correlate with mid-five-figure compensation premiums at the specialist level.professional society
- 04Medical Devices; Quality System Regulation Amendments (QMSR Final Rule harmonizing 21 CFR 820 with ISO 13485)U.S. Food and Drug Administration · Federal Register · 2024Finalizes alignment of 21 CFR 820 with ISO 13485, increasing the practical value of 13485 training for U.S. MedTech QA roles through the 2026 effective date and beyond.government
- 05DOI ↗Design control considerations for biologic-device combination productsD. Anderson; R. Liu; J. Anand Subramony; J. Cammack · Adv Drug Deliv Rev · 2017Narrative reviewdoi:10.1016/j.addr.2017.01.003
- 06DOI ↗Communicating medical device recalls: A rapid review of the literatureB. L. Tennant; C. L. Tesfaye; M. C. Chansky; B. Lappin; J. Weinberg; M. E. Ritchey; L. MacLennan; M. E. Tarver · Patient Educ Couns · 2024Systematic reviewdoi:10.1016/j.pec.2024.108244
- 07DOI ↗Impact of Design on Medical Device SafetyT. Miclăuş; V. Valla; A. Koukoura; A. A. Nielsen; B. Dahlerup; G. I. Tsianos; E. Vassiliadis · Ther Innov Regul Sci · 2020Narrative reviewdoi:10.1007/s43441-019-00022-4
- 08DOI ↗Quality of Reporting in Systematic Reviews of Implantable Medical DevicesG. Raman; J. M. Gaylor; M. Rao; J. Chan; A. Earley; L. K. W. Chang; P. Salvi; J. Lamont; J. Lau · Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US) · 2012Systematic reviewPMID 23270007
- 09DOI ↗Applying and validating a quality management system for in-house developed medical softwareV. Lagerburg; M. van den Boorn; R. F. Crane; K. Welvaars; J. M. Groen · Front Digit Health · 2025doi:10.3389/fdgth.2025.1461107
- 10DOI ↗Regulatory and HTA early dialogues in medical devicesC. R. Blankart; F. Dams; H. Penton; Z. Kaló; A. Zemplényi; K. Shatrov; R. Iskandar; C. Federici · Health Policy · 2021Qualitativedoi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.07.010
- 11DOI ↗Point-of-Care Orthopedic Oncology Device DevelopmentI. I. Mavrodontis; I. G. Trikoupis; V. A. Kontogeorgakos; O. D. Savvidou; P. J. Papagelopoulos · Curr Oncol · 2023doi:10.3390/curroncol31010014
- 12DOI ↗Medical device regulation and dialysis practice-impact on patients, doctors and manufacturersB. Meijers; R. Shroff; Y. Battaglia; R. Kazancioglu; G. Alfano; C. Franssen; M. Hecking; V. Luyckx; C. Combe · Nephrol Dial Transplant · 2026Narrative reviewdoi:10.1093/ndt/gfaf269
- 13DOI ↗Regulation (EU) 2017/746 (IVDR): practical implementation of annex I in pathologyA. Kahles; H. Goldschmid; A. L. Volckmar; C. Ploeger; D. Kazdal; R. Penzel; J. Budczies; C. Flechtenmacher; U. M. Gassner; M. Brüggemann; M. Vogeser; P. Schirmacher; A. Stenzinger · Pathologie (Heidelb) · 2023Narrative reviewdoi:10.1007/s00292-023-01274-6
- 14DOI ↗Medical device shelf-life and recalls: navigating healthcare challengesP. Thakor; S. Shah; A. Shah; O. V. Singh · Expert Rev Med Devices · 2025Narrative reviewdoi:10.1080/17434440.2025.2576140
- 15DOI ↗Medical device design processB. L. Gilman; J. E. Brewer; M. W. Kroll · Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc · 2009doi:10.1109/IEMBS.2009.5333644
- 16DOI ↗Nanostructured Medical Devices: Regulatory Perspective and Current ApplicationsG. D'Avenio; C. Daniele; M. Grigioni · Materials (Basel) · 2024Narrative reviewdoi:10.3390/ma17081787
- 17DOI ↗Towards quality management of artificial intelligence systems for medical applicationsL. Mercolli; A. Rominger; K. Shi · Z Med Phys · 2024doi:10.1016/j.zemedi.2024.02.001
- 18DOI ↗Translating the regulatory landscape of medical devices to create fit-for-purpose artificial intelligence (AI) cytometry solutionsG. Bogdanoski; F. Lucas; W. Kern; K. Czechowska · Cytometry B Clin Cytom · 2024Narrative reviewdoi:10.1002/cyto.b.22167
- 19DOI ↗Best practices in early phase medical device development: Engineering, prototyping, and the beginnings of a quality management systemK. Fearis; A. Petrie · Surgery · 2017doi:10.1016/j.surg.2016.08.052
- 20DOI ↗Japanese Regulatory Considerations for Interoperability of Medical DevicesK. Ishimoto; T. Arafune; T. Washio; Y. Haishima; Koichiro Matsumoto; M. Uematsu; Y. Nomura; H. Yokoi; H. Sato; Madoka Murakami; Y. Okazaki; K. Tachibana; M. Kondoh · Ther Innov Regul Sci · 2023Narrative reviewdoi:10.1007/s43441-022-00444-7
- 21DOI ↗Efficient Quality Management in MedTech Start-Ups (Based on ISO 13485)O. Kheir; S. Smedts; A. Jacoby; S. Verwulgen · Med Devices (Auckl) · 2021doi:10.2147/MDER.S320583
- 22DOI ↗Quality analysis of manufacturer's incident reports regarding medical devicesA. Simunovic; K. Kranjcec; M. Pekas; S. Tomic · J Pharm Policy Pract · 2023doi:10.1186/s40545-023-00519-2
- 23DOI ↗Medical device regulation (MDR) from a dental perspectiveD. Mohn; M. Zehnder · Front Dent Med · 2023Narrative reviewdoi:10.3389/fdmed.2023.1155820