Skip to content
Certification · OT · PT

Assistive Technology Professional (ATP)

35 citations · 4 lenses scored

RESNA ATP credential. AT device selection and application. Technology-focused; no comparative outcome studies for ATP vs non-certified AT provision.

Score anatomy · every lens
Industry placement ×25
55/100

RESNA ATP is the standard credential for AT vendors (Permobil, Sunrise, Tobii Dynavox) hiring clinical reps.

Vendor / employer demand ×20
58/100

Consistent demand from complex rehab and AAC manufacturers.

Salary premium ×20
45/100

Modest premium; ATP is often a requirement for industry roles rather than a bonus.

Technical skill depth ×15
52/100

Develops practical fluency across mobility, AAC, EADL, and sensor-based AT.

Transition fit ×10
60/100

One of the most established clinical-to-industry credentials in AT/medtech.

Credential investment ×10
48/100

Reasonable cost relative to industry recognition.

Sources · 35 on file
Evidence mix
Systematic review
13
37%
Narrative review
4
11%
Cross-sectional
3
9%
Clinical guideline
2
6%
Cohort study
1
3%
Meta-analysis
1
3%
Qualitative
1
3%
Other
10
29%
Publication years69% since 2022
10
Last reviewed 2026-1035 sources
29 other2 government2 peer-reviewed1 professional-society1 industry
  1. 01
    Wheeled and Seated Mobility Devices Provision: Quantitative Findings and SWOT Thematic Analysis of a Global Occupational Therapist Survey
    H. I. Sarsak; C. von Zweck; R. Ledgerd; T. On Behalf Of The World Federation Of Occupational · Healthcare (Basel) · 2023
    Cross-sectionaldoi:10.3390/healthcare11081075
    DOI ↗
  2. 02
    Rehabilitation engineers, technologists, and technicians: Vital members of the assistive technology team
    C. P. DiGiovine; M. Donahue; P. Bahr; M. Bresler; J. Klaesner; R. Pagadala; B. Burkhardt; R. Grott · Assist Technol · 2023
    Narrative reviewdoi:10.1080/10400435.2018.1454713
    DOI ↗
  3. 03
    Effect of the Assistive Technology Professional on the Provision of Mobility Assistive Equipment
    R. M. Schein; A. Yang; G. P. McKernan; M. Mesoros; G. Pramana; M. R. Schmeler; B. E. Dicianno · Arch Phys Med Rehabil · 2021
    Cohort studydoi:10.1016/j.apmr.2021.03.024
    DOI ↗
  4. 04
    An exploratory study analyzing demographics and opinions of assistive technology professionals within the complex rehab technology industry
    J. Nix; R. M. Schein; D. Clayback; D. M. Brienza; M. R. Schmeler · Assist Technol · 2021
    doi:10.1080/10400435.2019.1619634
    DOI ↗
  5. 05
    Perceptions of Assistive Technology Education From Occupational Therapists Certified as Assistive Technology Professionals
    K. M. Dishman; J. Duckart; L. J. Hardman · Am J Occup Ther · 2021
    doi:10.5014/ajot.2021.041541
    DOI ↗
  6. 06
    Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics: Rehabilitation Engineers and Medical Equipment Specialists (SOC 17-2199, 49-9062)
    U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · BLS OEWS · 2024
    BLS wage and employment data show rehabilitation/assistive technology engineering and medical equipment specialist roles as defined industry occupations with employer demand outside clinical practice, the labor-market substrate ATP-holders move into.
    government
    DOI ↗
  7. 07
    Pediatric physical therapists' perceptions of their training in assistive technology
    Long TM, Perry DF · Physical Therapy · 2008
    Documents that clinicians lack formal AT training in entry-level curricula, establishing the ATP credential as the recognized credentialing pathway clinicians use to qualify for AT-vendor, supplier, and industry roles.
    doi:10.2522/ptj.20070164
    DOI ↗
  8. 08
    ATP Certification Candidate Handbook and Job Task Analysis
    RESNA (Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology Society of North America) · RESNA Professional Standards Board · 2023
    RESNA's job task analysis defines the ATP scope around product evaluation, supplier/manufacturer interaction, and funding documentation - the exact competencies AT manufacturers and complex rehab technology (CRT) suppliers require for hire.
    professional society
    DOI ↗
  9. 09
    Complex Rehabilitation Technology Supplier Standards and ATP Requirement (Standard 30, 42 CFR 424.57)
    Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services · CMS Medicare Supplier Standards · 2023
    Federal Medicare rules require an ATP to be involved in the provision of certain complex rehab equipment, creating a regulatory mandate that drives industry/supplier employment demand for ATP credential-holders.
    government
    DOI ↗
  10. 10
    Patient satisfaction with telerehabilitation assessments for wheeled mobility and seating
    Schein RM, Schmeler MR, Saptono A, Brienza D · Assistive Technology · 2010
    From the University of Pittsburgh ATP-credentialed research group, illustrates the digital-health/telehealth industry pathway (remote AT assessment platforms) that ATP-trained clinicians staff as clinical specialists for medtech vendors.
    doi:10.1080/10400435.2010.518579
    DOI ↗
  11. 11
    Complex Rehab Technology Industry Workforce and Access Report
    AAHomecare / NCART · American Association for Homecare / National Coalition for Assistive and Rehab Technology · 2022
    Industry workforce analysis showing CRT suppliers (Numotion, National Seating & Mobility, Permobil, Sunrise Medical) employ ATP-credentialed clinicians as the standard hiring qualification for assistive technology specialist roles.
    industry
    DOI ↗
  12. 12
    Assistive devices, hip precautions, environmental modifications and training to prevent dislocation and improve function after hip arthroplasty
    T. O. Smith; P. Jepson; A. Beswick; G. Sands; A. Drummond; E. T. Davis; C. M. Sackley · Cochrane Database Syst Rev · 2016
    Systematic reviewdoi:10.1002/14651858.CD010815.pub2
    DOI ↗
  13. 13
    Wheelchair provision guidelines
    World Health Organization · 2023
    Clinical guidelinePMID 37410877
    DOI ↗
  14. 14
    Toward guidelines for reporting assistive technology device outcomes
    J. R. Tuazon; J. W. Jutai · Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol · 2021
    Clinical guidelinedoi:10.1080/17483107.2019.1697384
    DOI ↗
  15. 15
    Effects of Interventions That Include Aided Augmentative and Alternative Communication Input on the Communication of Individuals With Complex Communication Needs: A Meta-Analysis
    T. O'Neill; J. Light; L. Pope · J Speech Lang Hear Res · 2018
    Meta-analysisdoi:10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-17-0132
    DOI ↗
  16. 16
    Guidelines for assistive technology service provision - A scoping review
    N. Layton; A. Spann; M. Khan; S. Contepomi; E. J. Hoogerwerf; D. Bell; L. de Witte · Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol · 2024
    Systematic reviewdoi:10.1080/17483107.2024.2327515
    DOI ↗
  17. 17
    Ergonomics in assistive technology design: scoping review
    L. L. Umbelino; D. M. T. P. Ferreira; C. M. D. C. Alonso · Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol · 2026
    Systematic reviewdoi:10.1080/17483107.2026.2671838
    DOI ↗
  18. 18
    Worldwide Survey on Digital Assistive Technology (DAT) Provision
    I. Margot-Cattin; A. Deblock-Bellamy; J. Wassmer; R. Ledgerd; C. von Zweck; World Federation Of Occupational Therapists Wfot · Occup Ther Int · 2024
    Cross-sectionaldoi:10.1155/2024/9536020
    DOI ↗
  19. 19
    Disabled-by-design: effects of inaccessible urban public spaces on users of mobility assistive devices - a systematic review
    E. Kapsalis; N. Jaeger; J. Hale · Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol · 2024
    Systematic reviewdoi:10.1080/17483107.2022.2111723
    DOI ↗
  20. 20
    Wheelchair and seating assistive technology provision: a gateway to freedom
    R. J. Gowran; A. Clifford; A. Gallagher; J. McKee; B. O'Regan; E. A. McKay · Disabil Rehabil · 2022
    Qualitativedoi:10.1080/09638288.2020.1768303
    DOI ↗
  21. 21
    Assistive technology to facilitate children's play: a scoping review
    M. Dabiri Golchin; J. Ripat; M. Verdonck · Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol · 2024
    Systematic reviewdoi:10.1080/17483107.2023.2298825
    DOI ↗
  22. 22
    Cognitive impairment and assistive devices: Outcomes and adverse effects
    J. Alkadri; J. Jutai · J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng · 2016
    Narrative reviewdoi:10.1177/2055668316668146
    DOI ↗
  23. 23
    Available Assistive Technology Outcome Measures: Systematic Review
    F. Borgnis; L. Desideri; R. M. Converti; C. Salatino · JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol · 2023
    Systematic reviewdoi:10.2196/51124
    DOI ↗
  24. 24
    MSc Educational Assistive Technology: Training an Emergent Professional Group
    R. Slaughter; A. Waller; T. Griffiths · Stud Health Technol Inform · 2023
    doi:10.3233/SHTI230661
    DOI ↗
  25. 25
    Economic evaluation of wheelchairs interventions: a systematic review
    E. C. Ferretti; E. Suzumura; L. M. Rozman; R. A. Cooper; P. C. de Soárez · Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol · 2023
    Systematic reviewdoi:10.1080/17483107.2021.1993360
    DOI ↗
  26. 26
    Evaluation of providers' assistive technology service delivery practices in Pakistan
    A. Khan; M. Goldberg; J. Pearlman; L. Terhorst · Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol · 2024
    Cross-sectionaldoi:10.1080/17483107.2023.2257764
    DOI ↗
  27. 27
    Head support in wheelchairs (scoping review): state-of-the-art and beyond
    A. M. Geers; E. C. Prinsen; D. J. van der Pijl; A. Bergsma; J. S. Rietman; B. F. J. M. Koopman · Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol · 2023
    Systematic reviewdoi:10.1080/17483107.2021.1892840
    DOI ↗
  28. 28
    Vocational outcomes following assistive technology and digital workplace supports for people with disabilities: a systematic review
    S. K. Nwonyi; N. Phasha · Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol · 2026
    Systematic reviewdoi:10.1080/17483107.2026.2666392
    DOI ↗
  29. 29
    Use of Assistive Technology for Persons with Psychosocial Disability: Systematic Review
    I. D. Ebuenyi; C. Flocks-Monaghan; S. S. Rai; R. Vries; S. S. Bhuyan; J. Pearlman; N. Jones · JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol · 2023
    Systematic reviewdoi:10.2196/49750
    DOI ↗
  30. 30
    RESNA position on assistive technology for lying posture care management
    P. J. Toole; T. Kittelson; L. A. Hoffman; J. Hutson; K. Bopes · Assist Technol · 2026
    doi:10.1080/10400435.2025.2543691
    DOI ↗
  31. 31
    A Systematic Review of Augmentative and Alternative Communication Interventions for Children Aged From 0 to 6 Years
    O. Leonet; M. Orcasitas-Vicandi; A. Langarika-Rocafort; N. I. Mondragon; G. R. Etxebarrieta · Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch · 2022
    Systematic reviewdoi:10.1044/2022_LSHSS-21-00191
    DOI ↗
  32. 32
    Mobility-related assistive technology device classifications: implications for outcomes research
    L. L. Shoemaker; J. A. Lenker; M. J. Fuhrer; J. W. Jutai; L. Demers; F. DeRuyter · Am J Phys Med Rehabil · 2009
    Narrative reviewdoi:10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181bc0d55
    DOI ↗
  33. 33
    Assistive technology, information asymmetry and the role of brokerage services: a scoping review
    N. M. D'Cunha; S. Isbel; J. Goss; L. Pezzullo; N. Naumovski; D. Gibson · BMJ Open · 2022
    Systematic reviewdoi:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063938
    DOI ↗
  34. 34
    E-learning for assistive technology professionals--a review of the TELEMATE project
    A. Turner-Smith; A. Devlin · Med Eng Phys · 2005
    Narrative reviewdoi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2004.09.019
    DOI ↗
  35. 35
    Assistive technology accommodations for post-secondary students with mental health disabilities: a scoping review
    S. Ko; L. S. Petty · Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol · 2022
    Systematic reviewdoi:10.1080/17483107.2020.1815087
    DOI ↗
All credentialsMethodology
Open in the field